However, it also suggests that solitary errors are unlikely to lead to investigations or fines.
Rather, the CRTC examines the hundreds of thousands of complaints it receives from Canadians to identify trends and suitable targets for enforcement.
The cases have thus far focused on legitimate businesses that fail to comply with the law.
That can be expected to continue, but the enforcement agencies must also turn their attention to the large spamming organizations that are still operating in Canada.
Whether you're on the hunt for practical dating advice, insight into our most famous success story, or Plenty Of Fish's past coverage in the press, you've come to the right place. Check out our You Tube channel and keep up to date on our newest promotions.
Turn your hobby into a business like I have with Spend Bitcoins.
The first CRTC case involved Compu-Finder, a Quebec-based corporate training company that sent commercial emails without consent and without proper unsubscribe mechanisms.
Their email practices accounted for a quarter of the complaints in the sector received by the CRTC.Plenty of Fish agreed to settle the case by paying a ,000 penalty and developing a compliance program to address its email practices.While most of the anti-spam law enforcement attention has focused on the CRTC, the biggest case to date originates from the Competition Bureau.The case now heads to the Competition Tribunal, where the Bureau is seeking million in penalties as well as customer refunds.These cases confirm that the Canadian anti-spam law comes as advertised with tough penalties and enforcement agencies that will not hesitate to use it.The Commission received complaints that the company was sending commercial emails without a clear and working unsubscribe mechanism.